Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Adverse pro-tumorigenic effects of IDO1 catalytic inhibitors mediated by the non-enzymatic function of IDO1 in tumor cells
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1680896
Figure Lengend Snippet: IDO1 catalytic inhibitors enhance the non-enzymatic function of IDO1 in FTC-133 cells. (A) p-Tyr immunoprecipitation (IP) and IDO1 immunoblot analysis in FTC-133 cells treated with EPA, LIN, and NAV (1 µM) for 4 h Vehicle-treated cells were used as control (ctrl), whereas WCLs were used as controls of input protein expression, and a negative control (n.c.; i.e., only resin) was included. (B) Phosphorylated Src (p-Src) and total Src immunoblot analysis of FTC-133 cells treated as in (A) . In (A, B) β-tubulin or actin were used as normalizers and quantitative data from densitometric analysis (pTyr-IDO1 or pSrc/Src ratios, respectively) are reported as FC of treated versus ctrl cells (1-fold), above the corresponding bands. (C) Tyr-phosphorylation of rhIDO1 incubated with rhSrc in the presence of ATP (100 µM) for 60 min. rhIDO1 was preconditioned with EPA, NAV, and LIN (10 μM) for 30 min prior to rhSrc exposure, while vehicle-preconditioned rhIDO1 was used as a ctrl. The p-Tyr/IDO1 ratio and the p-Src/Src ratio were calculated by densitometric analysis and reported as FC of EPA/LIN/NAV-conditioned samples versus the ctrl sample (60 min; dotted line, 1-fold). (D) Kinase activity of rhSrc incubated as in (C) and reported as FC of relative light unit (RLU) measured in EPA/LIN/NAV-conditioned samples versus the ctrl sample (dotted line, 1-fold). (E) In situ PLA between IDO1 and Src performed in FTC-133 cells treated with EPA, LIN, and NAV (1 μM) for 1 h (F) In situ PLA between IDO1 and SHP-2 performed in FTC-133 cells treated with EPA, LIN, and NAV (1 μM) for 16 h In (E, F) vehicle-treated cells were used as ctrl. For each condition, a representative field of view is shown (60× magnification; scale bar: 10 µm) and the number of red spots, indicating the single IDO1/Src (E) or IDO1/SHP-2 (F) interaction, is reported as a function of cell number in each field of view. For (A–C) one representative immunoblot of three is shown. Data in (A–F) are mean ± SD of independent experiments ( N = 3) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Bonferroni’s test.
Article Snippet: IDO1 protein expression was analyzed by means of a rabbit monoclonal anti-human IDO1 antibody (D5J4ETM, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), whereas the SHP-2 protein level was detected using a mouse monoclonal anti -SH-PTP2 antibody (clone B-1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA).
Techniques: Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Control, Expressing, Negative Control, Phospho-proteomics, Incubation, Activity Assay, In Situ